The ”Raw article (P2 output)” field is empty, so there is no HTML to validate or repair. Please paste the P2 article and I’ll run the 14 gates plus the intro and language checks on it.

Senaste artiklar

Before you do, you may want to check these issues in the upstream inputs, since the article will inherit them:

– **Unsupported figures:** The content plan cites a lowest price of 5 124 kr, but the research notes give 5 696 kr (Prisjakt, 2025-07-15). The 5 124 kr figure appears nowhere in the research.
– **Unsourced technology names:** ”PreciSense” and ”HyperForce” appear in the content plan but not in the research facts. The research mentions ”VibraRise 2.0” only.
– **Conflicting mop lift:** Ljud & Bild says 6 mm and Roborock’s official page says 5 mm. Gate 4 would only settle this if a verified_facts entry covers it, and the only entry is Roborock’s 5 mm. The article should attribute each figure to its source rather than state one as fact.
– **Dust bin conflict:** Verified facts list 300, 350 and 400 ml with `verified_by_count: 1`. Gate 4 cannot resolve this, so the article should present it as an open disagreement.
– **Q8 comparison:** The contract requires an S8 vs. Q8 comparison, but the research has no Q8 data. Gate 2 would force an H2 that the sources cannot support. The research covers S8+ and Q Revo instead.
– **Research confidence:** It is marked ”low”, so Gate 10 will require the rumor list to be at least as long as the confirmed list.